From the Boston Globe:Logan International Airport officials’ ongoing quest to ban airline lounges from offering passengers free WiFi Internet services is angering a growing array of powerful Capitol Hill lobbying groups, who say Logan could set a dangerous nationwide precedent for squelching wireless services....If Logan wants to offer a paid service, it should find a way to make it a worthwhile investment for its customers, rather than seizing the market by shutting down the competition. Suggestion - the article suggests that airport WiFi is generally 802.11b. Why not offer 802.11g for the $8, and upgrade to MIMO as soon as standards converge? Why not set up a consortium with other national airports to offer a one logon service for frequent travellers? [Emphasis added--JGM.] All of these service improvements, of course, would be unlikely to come from a provider who could simply take the market without competing for the customers.Last point - this is as good an example as one could ask for as to why it’s so important to keep government and near-government out of the business of providing innovative services. [I'm not sure that follows--JGM.] [But this makes sense:] It is simply unforgivable at this point that all major airports are not completely saturated with connectivity.
Thoughts on the present and future of legal information, legal research, and legal education.
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
Why no free WiFi at airports?
And now for something completely different, from robhyndman.com: Logan Seizes Control Over Airport WiFi:
No comments:
Post a Comment